SOC 2 Type II or Bust: 2025 Compliance Checklist for Embedded Accounting APIs | Open Ledger

July 15, 2025

Introduction

Enterprise fintech buyers are increasingly asking one critical question: "Is your embedded accounting provider SOC 2 compliant?" This shift reflects a broader industry awakening to the security risks inherent in financial API integrations. (Microsoft Compliance) Financial data breaches cost enterprises an average of $4.45 million in 2023, while API vulnerabilities accounted for 54% of successful financial system breaches in 2024. (Open Ledger)

SOC 2 Type II attestation has become the gold standard for embedded accounting APIs, representing a comprehensive examination of controls over security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. (AICPA) Unlike Type I reports that only assess control design at a point in time, Type II evaluations test operational effectiveness over a 6-12 month period, providing the assurance enterprise buyers demand.

This comprehensive checklist will guide embedded accounting API providers through the essential controls, audit artifacts, and automation tools needed to achieve SOC 2 Type II compliance in 2025. We'll examine real-world implementations, highlight red flags to avoid, and provide a practical roadmap for passing your first Type II audit. (Compass ITC)

The SOC 2 Type II Landscape for Embedded Accounting APIs

Understanding the Trust Services Criteria

SOC 2 compliance is built around five Trust Services Criteria established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (Wikipedia) For embedded accounting APIs, each criterion carries specific implications:

Security (CC1-CC8): The foundation of all other criteria, covering logical access controls, system monitoring, and change management. Embedded accounting platforms must demonstrate robust authentication mechanisms, encrypted data transmission, and comprehensive logging of all API interactions. (Open Ledger)

Availability (A1): Critical for financial operations that cannot tolerate downtime during month-end close or tax season. Rate limits of 1,000 rps with burst capacity to 5,000 ensure systems remain responsive during peak usage periods. (Open Ledger)

Processing Integrity (PI1): Ensures transaction data remains accurate and complete throughout the API lifecycle. AI-driven categorization systems must maintain audit trails showing how transactions are classified and reconciled. (Open Ledger)

Confidentiality (C1): Protects sensitive financial information through encryption, access controls, and data classification schemes. This is particularly crucial for embedded accounting APIs that handle multi-tenant data across various client organizations.

Privacy (P1-P8): Governs the collection, use, retention, and disposal of personal information within financial datasets, increasingly important as privacy regulations expand globally.

2025 Compliance Trends Shaping the Audit Landscape

SOC 2 compliance in 2025 involves proactive system protection and utilization of new tools and techniques. Real-time monitoring with AI assistance is becoming a standard for spotting potential security issues early. (OpenMetal) Zero Trust security, which involves constant verification of access requests, is becoming more prevalent in embedded accounting architectures.

AI platforms face unique compliance challenges, as SOC 2 compliance demonstrates that an AI platform has effective controls in place to protect the security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy of data. (Compass ITC) For embedded accounting APIs leveraging machine learning for transaction categorization and reconciliation, this means implementing controls around model training data, algorithm transparency, and automated decision-making processes.

Essential Controls for SOC 2 Type II Compliance

Access Management and Authentication Controls

Control Category	Implementation Requirements	Audit Evidence
Multi-Factor Authentication	Mandatory for all administrative access	MFA logs, policy documentation
Role-Based Access Control	Principle of least privilege	User access reviews, role matrices
API Key Management	Rotation policies, secure storage	Key lifecycle documentation
Session Management	Timeout policies, concurrent session limits	Session logs, configuration files

Implementation Deep Dive: Embedded accounting APIs must implement robust identity and access management (IAM) frameworks that support both internal administrative access and external API consumer authentication. Most product teams ship the first integration with fewer than 50 lines of code and go live in under two weeks, but this rapid deployment capability must be balanced with security controls. (Open Ledger)

API authentication should leverage industry-standard protocols like OAuth 2.0 with PKCE (Proof Key for Code Exchange) for public clients and client credentials flow for server-to-server communications. Token management policies must address refresh token rotation, scope limitations, and revocation procedures.

Data Protection and Encryption Controls

Financial data encryption requirements extend beyond simple TLS in transit. SOC 2 Type II auditors expect to see:

Encryption at Rest: AES-256 encryption for all stored financial data
Key Management: Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) or cloud-native key management services
Data Classification: Automated tagging and handling procedures for different data sensitivity levels
Tokenization: Replacement of sensitive data elements with non-sensitive tokens where applicable

The adoption of the Rust programming language in financial firmware has cut memory-related vulnerabilities by 84%, demonstrating how technology choices can significantly impact security posture. (Open Ledger)

System Monitoring and Incident Response

Continuous monitoring capabilities must demonstrate:

{
  "monitoring_requirements": {
    "real_time_alerting": {
      "failed_authentication_attempts": "threshold_based",
      "unusual_api_usage_patterns": "ml_anomaly_detection",
      "data_access_violations": "immediate_notification"
    },
    "log_retention": {
      "security_events": "minimum_1_year",
      "api_transactions": "minimum_7_years",
      "system_changes": "minimum_3_years"
    },
    "incident_response": {
      "detection_time": "under_15_minutes",
      "escalation_procedures": "documented_runbooks",
      "communication_plan": "stakeholder_matrix"
    }
  }
}

Embedded accounting security refers to the specialized protection measures integrated directly into financial management systems to safeguard data as it moves between interconnected platforms. (Open Ledger) This requires implementing comprehensive logging that captures not just API calls but also the business context of financial transactions.

Change Management and Development Controls

SOC 2 Type II auditors scrutinize software development lifecycle (SDLC) controls to ensure changes don't introduce security vulnerabilities:

Code Review Requirements: Mandatory peer review for all production code changes
Automated Testing: Security scanning, dependency vulnerability checks, and regression testing
Deployment Controls: Segregation of duties between development and production environments
Rollback Procedures: Documented and tested procedures for reverting problematic changes

AI removes 80% of manual bookkeeping drudgery, but this automation must be balanced with appropriate controls around model updates and algorithm changes. (Open Ledger) Continuous-learning models that auto-categorize transactions and suggest reconciliations with 97% accuracy in pilot benchmarks require special attention to model governance and explainability.

Audit Artifacts and Documentation Requirements

Policy and Procedure Documentation

SOC 2 Type II audits require comprehensive documentation demonstrating that controls are not only designed but also operating effectively. Essential policy documents include:

Information Security Policy Suite:

Data classification and handling procedures
Incident response and business continuity plans
Vendor risk management frameworks
Employee security awareness training programs

Operational Procedures:

System backup and recovery procedures
Change management workflows
Access provisioning and deprovisioning checklists
Monitoring and alerting runbooks

Evidence Collection Matrix

Control Domain	Required Evidence	Collection Frequency	Retention Period
Access Controls	User access reviews, privilege escalation logs	Monthly	3 years
Data Protection	Encryption key rotations, data loss prevention alerts	Quarterly	7 years
System Operations	Backup verifications, disaster recovery tests	Monthly	3 years
Vendor Management	Due diligence assessments, contract reviews	Annually	7 years
Incident Response	Security incident reports, lessons learned	As needed	7 years

Automated Evidence Collection

Modern SOC 2 compliance programs leverage automation tools to reduce manual effort and improve evidence quality. Popular platforms include:

Drata: Provides continuous monitoring and automated evidence collection for cloud-native environments. Integrates with AWS, Azure, and GCP to automatically gather configuration snapshots, access logs, and security findings.

Vanta: Offers real-time compliance monitoring with pre-built integrations for common SaaS tools. Particularly strong for startups and scale-ups implementing their first SOC 2 program.

Secureframe: Focuses on streamlined audit preparation with automated control testing and evidence mapping to SOC 2 requirements.

These platforms can significantly reduce the manual effort required for SOC 2 compliance, but they must be properly configured to capture the unique requirements of embedded accounting APIs. (Open Ledger)

Red Flags: API Vendors with Only Type I Attestations

Understanding the Type I vs. Type II Distinction

SOC 1 reports are specifically intended to meet the needs of entities that use service organizations and the CPAs that audit the user entities' financial statements. (AICPA) However, for embedded accounting APIs, SOC 2 Type II provides the comprehensive assurance enterprise buyers require.

Type I attestations only evaluate control design at a specific point in time, while Type II examinations test operational effectiveness over an extended period. This distinction is crucial for embedded accounting providers because:

Warning Signs of Inadequate Compliance

Vendor Red Flags to Avoid:

"SOC 2 Compliant" Without Specifying Type: Vendors who claim SOC 2 compliance without clearly stating Type II may only hold Type I attestations or be in the process of pursuing compliance.
Outdated Attestation Reports: SOC 2 reports are typically valid for one year. Vendors with reports older than 12-15 months may have lapsed coverage.
Limited Scope Attestations: Some vendors obtain SOC 2 reports that exclude critical systems or processes. Review the scope section carefully to ensure it covers the services you'll be using.
Reluctance to Share Reports: Legitimate SOC 2 Type II holders should readily provide their reports under appropriate non-disclosure agreements.
Missing Trust Services Criteria: Vendors who only address Security criteria while ignoring Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, or Privacy may not provide comprehensive protection.

Due Diligence Checklist for API Vendor Selection

## Vendor Compliance Verification Checklist

### Documentation Review
- [ ] Current SOC 2 Type II report (within 12 months)
- [ ] Scope includes all relevant systems and processes
- [ ] All five Trust Services Criteria addressed
- [ ] No material weaknesses or significant deficiencies
- [ ] Independent auditor with relevant experience

### Technical Assessment
- [ ] API security documentation and architecture diagrams
- [ ] Incident response procedures and contact information
- [ ] Data residency and cross-border transfer policies
- [ ] Backup and disaster recovery capabilities
- [ ] Performance and availability SLAs

### Contractual Protections
- [ ] Data processing agreements (DPAs)
- [ ] Liability and indemnification clauses
- [ ] Right to audit provisions
- [ ] Termination and data return procedures
- [ ] Breach notification requirements

Implementation Roadmap: Achieving SOC 2 Type II Compliance

Phase 1: Foundation Building (Months 1-3)

Readiness Assessment: Begin with a comprehensive gap analysis comparing current controls against SOC 2 requirements. This assessment should cover all five Trust Services Criteria and identify areas requiring immediate attention.

Policy Development: Develop or update core security policies, including information security, incident response, and change management procedures. These policies form the foundation for all subsequent control implementations.

Tool Selection and Implementation: Select and implement compliance automation tools like Drata or Vanta. These platforms can significantly reduce ongoing compliance burden and provide continuous monitoring capabilities.

Phase 2: Control Implementation (Months 4-8)

Access Management: Implement multi-factor authentication, role-based access controls, and regular access reviews. For embedded accounting APIs, this includes both administrative access and API consumer authentication mechanisms.

Data Protection: Deploy encryption at rest and in transit, implement data classification schemes, and establish key management procedures. The Unified Ledger API can auto-generate default GL buckets or map to existing QuickBooks codes using the migration toolkit that cuts manual CSV fixes by 80%. (Open Ledger)

Monitoring and Logging: Implement comprehensive logging and monitoring solutions that capture security events, API transactions, and system changes. Establish alerting thresholds and incident response procedures.

Phase 3: Testing and Validation (Months 9-12)

Internal Testing: Conduct internal control testing to validate that implemented controls are operating effectively. This includes penetration testing, vulnerability assessments, and control walkthroughs.

Pre-Audit Preparation: Gather evidence documentation, conduct management reviews, and address any identified deficiencies before the formal audit begins.

Auditor Selection: Choose a qualified CPA firm with experience in SOC 2 audits for technology companies, particularly those with embedded financial services experience.

Phase 4: Audit Execution and Certification (Months 12-15)

Audit Fieldwork: Support the auditor's testing procedures by providing requested documentation and facilitating interviews with key personnel.

Issue Resolution: Address any findings or recommendations identified during the audit process. Most issues can be resolved through additional documentation or control enhancements.

Report Issuance: Receive the final SOC 2 Type II report and begin using it in sales processes and vendor due diligence activities.

Leveraging AI and Automation for Compliance

AI-Powered Compliance Monitoring

SOC 2 compliance for AI platforms requires demonstrating that artificial intelligence systems maintain appropriate controls around data processing and decision-making. (Compass ITC) For embedded accounting APIs, this means implementing controls around:

Model Governance:

Version control for machine learning models
Training data lineage and quality controls
Model performance monitoring and drift detection
Explainability and audit trail requirements

Automated Decision-Making:

Controls around AI-driven transaction categorization
Human oversight requirements for high-risk decisions
Bias detection and mitigation procedures
Model rollback and override capabilities

AI-driven categorization cuts data-entry mistakes by over 80%, but this automation must be balanced with appropriate human oversight and control mechanisms. (Open Ledger)

Continuous Compliance Automation

Modern compliance programs leverage automation to maintain SOC 2 Type II controls continuously rather than treating compliance as an annual event:

# Example: Automated Access Review Process
def automated_access_review():
    """
    Automated quarterly access review for SOC 2 compliance
    """
    users = get_all_users()
    for user in users:
        last_login = get_last_login(user.id)
        if last_login > 90_days_ago:
            flag_for_review(user)

        permissions = get_user_permissions(user.id)
        if permissions.includes('admin') and not user.role == 'administrator':
            escalate_privilege_violation(user)

    generate_access_review_report()
    notify_compliance_team()

Infrastructure as Code (IaC): Implement security controls through code to ensure consistent configuration across environments. This approach provides audit trails for all infrastructure changes and enables automated compliance checking.

Continuous Security Testing: Integrate security scanning into CI/CD pipelines to identify vulnerabilities before they reach production. This includes static code analysis, dependency scanning, and container security assessments.

Industry-Specific Considerations for Embedded Accounting

Vertical SaaS Compliance Requirements

Vertical SaaS platforms are outpacing horizontal SaaS in growth as of 2024, with platforms handling complexities and nuances that broader tools couldn't tackle with the granularity needed by many SMBs. (Hurdlr) This growth brings unique compliance challenges:

Industry-Specific Regulations:

Healthcare: HIPAA compliance for medical practice management
Construction: Prevailing wage reporting and certified payroll requirements
Professional Services: Trust accounting and client fund segregation
E-commerce: Sales tax automation and multi-jurisdiction compliance

Multi-Tenant Architecture Considerations: Embedded accounting APIs must demonstrate data segregation between different client organizations while maintaining operational efficiency. This requires:

Logical data separation with encryption key isolation
Tenant-specific access controls and audit logging
Cross-tenant data leakage prevention
Scalable backup and recovery procedures

Integration Security Requirements

The platform offers 100+ pre-built data integrations, requiring comprehensive security controls around third-party connections. (Open Ledger) Key considerations include:

API Security:

OAuth 2.0 implementation with proper scope limitations
Rate limiting and DDoS protection
Input validation and sanitization
Comprehensive API logging and monitoring

Third-Party Risk Management:

Vendor security assessments for integration partners
Data sharing agreements and liability allocation
Monitoring of third-party security incidents
Regular review of integration permissions and access

Cost-Benefit Analysis of SOC 2 Type II Compliance

Investment Requirements

Initial Implementation Costs:

Compliance automation tools: $50,000-$200,000 annually
External audit fees: $75,000-$150,000 for initial Type II
Internal resource allocation: 2-3 FTE for 12-18 months
Infrastructure and tooling upgrades: $100,000-$500,000

Ongoing Maintenance Costs:

Annual audit fees: $50,000-$100,000
Compliance tool subscriptions: $50,000-$200,000 annually
Internal compliance team: 1-2 FTE ongoing
Continuous monitoring and improvement: $25,000-$75,000 annually

Business Value and ROI

Revenue Impact:

Enterprise deal acceleration: 25-40% faster sales cycles
Deal size increase: 15-30% higher ACV for compliant vendors
Market expansion: Access to enterprise and regulated industry customers
Competitive differentiation: Premium positioning versus non-compliant alternatives

Risk Mitigation:

Reduced breach probability and associated costs
Lower cyber insurance premiums
Regulatory compliance alignment
Enhanced customer trust and retention

Embedded accounting increases lifetime value by keeping critical tasks in one place, and SOC 2 Type II compliance amplifies this value proposition by providing the security assurance enterprise customers require. (Open Ledger)

Future-Proofing Your Compliance Program

Emerging Regulatory Landscape

The regulatory environment for embedded financial services continues to evolve, with new requirements emerging across multiple jurisdictions:

Privacy Regulations:

GDPR expansion and enforcement
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) updates
Emerging state-level privacy laws
Cross-border data transfer restrictions

Financial Services Regulations:

Open banking initiatives
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) guidance
Anti-money laundering (AML) requirements
Know Your Customer (KYC) obligations

Technology Evolution Impact

Emerging technologies will reshape SOC 2 compliance requirements:

Quantum Computing:

Post-quantum cryptography migration planning
Updated encryption standards and key lengths
Timeline for quantum-resistant algorithm adoption

Artificial Intelligence Governance:

AI model explainability requirements
Algorithmic bias detection and mitigation
Automated decision-making oversight
Machine learning model security controls

Zero Trust Architecture:

Identity-centric security models
Continuous authentication and authorization
Micro-segmentation and least privilege access
Device trust and endpoint security integration

Conclusion

SOC 2 Type II compliance has evolved from a nice-to-have differentiator to a mandatory requirement for embedded accounting API providers serving enterprise customers. The comprehensive control framework addresses the unique security challenges of financial data processing while providing the assurance enterprise buyers demand.

Successful compliance programs balance automation with human oversight, leveraging tools like Drata and Vanta to reduce manual effort while maintaining the rigor required for Type II attestation. ([OpenMetal](https://openmetal.io/resour

Frequently Asked Questions

What is SOC 2 Type II compliance and why is it critical for embedded accounting APIs?

SOC 2 Type II is an attestation performed under SSAE No. 18 that evaluates controls related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy over a period of time. For embedded accounting APIs, it's critical because enterprise fintech buyers increasingly require SOC 2 compliance due to the security risks inherent in financial API integrations, where data breaches cost an average of $4.45 million.

How does SOC 2 compliance differ from SOC 1 for financial service organizations?

SOC 1 focuses specifically on controls relevant to user entities' internal control over financial reporting and is intended for CPAs auditing financial statements. SOC 2, however, evaluates broader Trust Services Criteria including security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy, making it more comprehensive for service organizations handling sensitive financial data through APIs.

What are the key SOC 2 compliance trends for embedded accounting platforms in 2025?

Key trends include proactive system protection with real-time monitoring using AI assistance to spot security issues early, implementation of Zero Trust security models requiring constant verification of access requests, and enhanced automation tools for continuous compliance monitoring. These trends reflect the evolving landscape where compliance is becoming more dynamic and technology-driven.

How can embedded accounting security be enhanced to meet SOC 2 requirements?

According to Open Ledger's embedded accounting security guide, organizations should implement multi-layered security controls including encryption at rest and in transit, robust access controls, continuous monitoring systems, and comprehensive audit logging. These measures align with SOC 2's Trust Services Criteria and help demonstrate effective security controls during audits.

What audit artifacts are essential for SOC 2 Type II compliance in embedded accounting APIs?

Essential artifacts include security policies and procedures documentation, access control matrices, incident response logs, system monitoring reports, vulnerability assessment results, and evidence of control testing over the audit period. These artifacts demonstrate that controls are not only designed effectively but also operating effectively throughout the examination period.

How do automation tools help maintain SOC 2 compliance for embedded accounting platforms?

Automation tools streamline compliance by providing continuous monitoring of security controls, automated evidence collection for audits, real-time alerting for policy violations, and standardized reporting capabilities. This reduces manual effort, minimizes human error, and ensures consistent application of controls across the embedded accounting platform, making the SOC 2 audit process more efficient and reliable.

Sources

Get started with Open Ledger now.

Discover how Open Ledger’s embedded accounting API transforms your SaaS platform into a complete financial hub.

Schedule your demo Start building with Open Ledger